Athletic Trainers 4 Athletic Trainers
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Faculty Sponsors
    • Biography - Dr. Eberman
    • Biography - Dr. Games
    • Biography - Dr. Powden
    • Biography - Jessica Edler
    • Biography - Zachary Winkelmann
    • Biography - Kelsey Robinson
  • Contributing Authors
  • Contact

Hot Topic: What to do with Education in Athletic Training..

4/14/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
With the current clamoring of ATs regarding the “Professional Education in Athletic Training” whitepaper, we thought it best to engage you all in a healthy discussion.  While some will choose to stand by their position, we simply encourage everyone to become informed. Today’s topic, within the scope of transiting our degree to a masters level, we will be discussing the impact on curriculum.

Finding #5 of the whitepaper states that the “Transition to professional education at the graduate level would increase the likelihood that education programs are better aligned with other health care professional programs.”  In 1996, 17 years ago the NATA Board of Directors called upon us in education to align our programs with schools of health professions.  To date, that has not occurred given that only 21% of programs are housed within colleges/schools with other peer health professions programs.  As a member of a department with athletic training, physical therapy, physician assistant studies, and occupational therapy, I can tell you… my job as a Program Director is eased by the commonalities between programs. I do not face the same administrative misunderstanding that my colleagues often experience. Our programs are financially and administratively supported because of the similarities we share with other health professions.

Finding #6 of the whitepapers states that “Professional education at the graduate level should facilitate interprofessional education.”  For the 33% of programs housed in separate units and the 16% that are the only Athletic Training programs at their respective institutions, interprofessional education (IPE) is not only difficult, it can sometimes be impossible.  Moreover, programs, like ours at Indiana State, face different, less tangible challenges with IPE. We face circumstances where IPE with undergraduate students is scoffed at… because obviously it is “beneath” graduate students (from other disciplines) to spend time learning from with and about Athletic Training students learning at an undergraduate level.  Other disciplines sometimes fail to see the difference between professional and post-professional degrees… and while my graduate students are practicing clinicians and have already shaped their professional identity… the other disciplines would prefer work with them, simply because they are earning the “same” degree.

Finding #8 of the whitepaper states that “Professional education should not complete with general education, liberal arts, and foundational science requirements because it detracts from the effectiveness of the professional educational experience.” This, in my opinion, is the greatest challenge faced by our current educational model.  While a general education curricula is crucial to establishing contributing citizens, the competing demands of shaping a young person to contribute in the world and the development of a fine-tuned clinician is often at odds.  Add to this the competing demands of the millennial student and their needs to have life-work balance (NOT A CRITICISM from me!) and often jobs to support the growing cost of higher education.  Our undergraduate students are expected to do more, to be more than their classmates in other majors.  And the consequences are found in the quality of their clinical experience and the expectations, we as educators, can hold within our classrooms.

From this singular, only curricular perspective, a transition to a professional degree at the masters level has the potential to improve the quality of education and ability to interact with other disciplines with ease.  Furthermore, it will allow undergraduate to focus on the things that will make them strong contributors and effective graduate students.  And who knows… with a little creative curricular artistry, programs could be delivered in a 3+2=5 model to quicken the time to degree and potentially decrease cost, all without compromising the quality of the clinician.

Lindsey E. Eberman PhD, ATC  

2 Comments
Michael Hopper, ATC link
4/14/2014 12:27:03 pm

This is one of those things where I was pretty adamant but my stance has softened. I'm still not sold that going to an ELM is the answer to many problems in the profession. Do I think it's going to happen? Yes, in the next few years I have a feeling many schools will make the transition, if they can. Those who can't may begin to fade out.

Here are a few of my concerns:
1) Is the education truly improving or is it simply "degree inflation?"
2) What good does it do us if Texas remains off on its own and doesn't make the move to ELM as a requirement?
3) Our profession harps on the fact that 75%+ hold at least a Masters Degree. How long until a DAT becomes the "new standard?"

Reply
Zach
4/14/2014 01:46:21 pm

Mike,
In my own opinion not related to this blog writers or ISU, I must agree with you. I see the good but worry about some of your concerns. I would have to say the degree is actually improving by the means that the students are solely focusing on AT education during their Masters whereas other coursework is being mixed in with core classes. As a native of Texas and finishing my undergrad education in Texas program, I would have to agree that the licensure laws in Texas are an issue that needs to be addressed first before making the move educationally. I would also argue that California and Alaska need to have licensure before the move. The Texas licensure test is an issue in its own that needs to be reviewed. Finally, the DAT is coming and this is something very exciting for our profession. The DAT will allow a terminal degree for clinical athletic trainers. It will also serve as a post-professional level following the entry level masters. I appreciate the comment and must urge you to continue reading our blog this week for more info!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    We are graduate students in the Indiana State University Post-Professional Athletic Training Education Program.

    Contributing Authors

    ​DAT Cohort of 2017
    Dustin Anderson
    David Boyd
    Kelly Brock
    Brian Coulombe
    Ashley Crossway
    Melissa Ericson
    Caroline Guindon
    Carolyn Hampton
    Rachael Kirkpatrick
    Addam Kitchen
    Nico Merritt
    Evan Mulder
    Jamie Nikander
    Emma Nye
    Ethan Roberts
    Sean Rogers
    Shannan Rowe
    Devon Serrano
    Brittany Todaro
    Chelsey Toney
    Bobby Vallandingham

    DAT Cohort of 2018
    Danielle Allen
    Brian Betz
    Megan Bibler
    Josh Bush
    McCall Christopher
    Janet Craft
    Lucas Dargo
    Sean Degerstrom
    Teralyn Dodds
    Zach Dougal
    Elizabeth Fioretti
    Jared Hall
    Riley Koenig
    Dustin LeNorman
    Lauj Preacely
    Christine Reichert
    Matt Rivera
    Lacey Runyon
    Maura Shea
    Kristen Sims

    PhD Students
    Jessica Edler
    Zachary Winkelmann
    ​Kelsey Robinson

    Supervised by
    Dr. Lindsey Eberman
    Dr. Kenneth Games
    Dr. Cameron Powden


    Site Administrator
    Kelsey Robinson

    Archives

    December 2016
    September 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Branding
    Open Perspective
    Political Action
    University News

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.